n.
Natural selection conceived of as a struggle for life in which only those organisms best adapted to existing conditions are able to survive and reproduce.
Natural selection conceived of as a struggle for life in which only those organisms best adapted to existing conditions are able to survive and reproduce.
In my mind's eye, IF evolution is the truth of how humans got here on this earth, what happened to void the idea of natural selection? Because you have only to look around you to see there are many weak animals, humans, insects, you name it, there are those that are weak in that species.
Evolution would naturally have survival of the fittest as an aspect simply because there would be no human to temper this activity. Meaning, who would stop all the fighting? Of course we could ask that same question today as we look out upon the human race and the wars that have brought destruction to the earth all down through history as well as today. But you know very well what I'm getting at here.
IF evolution is truth, then survival of the fittest is in effect, which means we have no results of this activity in this world except in the wild life. The scientists would simply attempt to prove that as evolution changed the appearance of that little cell in the ocean until it became a man or woman, it also improved the brain and made it more complex with abilities never before seen by the wild animal man evolved from.
IF the above is true, we must also recognize the fact that muscle and strength doesn't always prove there is an above average brain. But this idea goes more with the next topic.
